Tag: agricultural research
Using a choice experiment approach to assess production tradeoffs for developing the croton value chain in Kenya
Mainstreaming Incentive Systems for Integrated Landscape Management: Lessons from Asia
Audited Financial Statements 2013
This paper asks: What have been the impacts of farmer- or community-led (informal) processes of research and development in agriculture and natural resource management in terms of food security, ecological sustainability, economic empowerment, gender relations, local capacity to innovate and influence on formal agricultural research and development institutions An innovative conceptual framework was applied to a diverse set of farmer-led research initiatives in countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America to explore approaches, outcomes and impacts of informal agricultural research and development (ARD) facilitated by civil society organisations. Findings include the following: locally appropriate technical innovations emerging from these processes are readily taken up by other farmers; the most common channels of dissemination are farmer to farmer through informal networks and spaces created for farmer-researchers and other farmers to meet and exchange, such as innovation fairs; livelihood impacts are broad and substantial; local capacity to innovate is strengthened and institutionalisation through the formal sector has been limited. Lessons are drawn for future partnerships in promoting and supporting farmer-led research involving formal and informal ARD actors working with smallholder communities.
Role of international research centers’ soil laboratories in agricultural development
The worldwide network of 16 research centers of the ConsultativeGroup for International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) focuses onresearch, training, education, and capacity-buildingwith the goalofpoverty alleviation through increased production, economicdevelopment,andenvironmental protectionin the poorer countriesof the world. The centers work in partnership with the nationalagricultural research systems as well as advanced research institutions. The pillars of their research aregermplasm enhance-mentandnatural resource management. The soil laboratory isfundamental to such research endeavors, involving analysis of soilsas a basis for soil characterization, identifying nutrient constraints,and establishing criteria for fertilizer application and efficientnutrient use, along with water, plant, and fertilizer analysis. The soillaboratory backstops both basic and applied research. Most CGIARcenters’ laboratories have atraining functionfor their region’snational programs, and are involved in networks to upgradeanalytical standards and maintain quality output. Many laboratoriesalso host students from regional universities for their graduateresearch. There is a need for an increased role for laboratory analysisin the future research and development programs of the internationalcenters. However, inherent weaknesses in the system will have to beaddressed, as well as improved staff training, centralization ofanalytical services, automation, and quality assurance. There willalso be a shift in the types of analysis as research programs placemore emphasis on environment rather than traditional soil fertilityconcerns.
Linking climate change research with food security and poverty reduction in the tropics
Climate change is a reality and will affect the poor in developing countries in many ways. The effectiveness of global change research could be substantially improved by linking International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) study with Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) centres based in the tropics. These centres are carrying interdisciplinary research and development on how to achieve food security and reduce rural poverty through the innovative management of natural resources. A CGIAR intercentre working group on climate change (ICWG-CC) identified joint opportunities that take advantage of the comparative advantages of both institutions. CGIAR centres will focus on adaptation and mitigation research in developing countries. A natural resource management research approach is suggested, which consists of six steps: (1) identifying and quantifying the extent of food insecurity, rural poverty and resource degradation; (2) conducting technological and policy research on economic and environmental functions; (3) optimising the trade-offs between global environmental benefits and private farmer benefits; (4) extrapolating and disseminating results, including research on policy implementation; (5) assessing impact and (6) providing feedback.Two examples of current CGIAR research illustrate this approach. Agroforestry alternatives to slash and burn (ASB) agriculture at tropical forest margins were identified and the trade-offs between carbon sequestration and farmer profitability provided options to policy makers. Land tenure problems were resolved with participatory policy research. Agroforestry practices sequester an additional 57 Mg C per ha, three times that of croplands or grasslands are able to do. Soil nutrient capital is being replenished in subhumid tropical Africa through improved leguminous tree fallows, rock phosphate and biomass transfers of Tithonia diversifolia, helping farmers to attain food security. Afterwards, when farmers shift to high-value tree or vegetable crop production, poverty is reduced. The transformation of low productivity croplands to sequential agroforestry is estimated to triple system carbon stocks in 20 years.
A Brief Guide for Research Engagement with Development Partners
Towards a natural resource management paradigm for international agriculture: the example of agroforestry research
The paper presents and discusses the dimensions of the integration of genetic improvement research and natural resource management research (integrated NRM) paradigm. It illustrates the discussions with examples drawn from the agenda which the International Research Centre for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF) has been developing. First the concepts of natural capital and ecosystem hierarchies are discussed as they form the backbone of the theoretical framework of the proposed agenda. The principal components of the agenda are discussed and illustrated using example from agroforestry research. In the last section the main differences between this new NRM paradigm and the more traditional genetic improvement paradigm are highlighted; and the dimensions of this agenda which are still unresolved are identified.
Situational Analysis Report: Xishuangbanna Autonomous Dai Prefecture Yunnan, China
This report summarizes the situation of rural development, agriculture and environment as it is perceived by expert opinion and literature evidence, as of 2014/2015. It is written as part of the CGIAR Research Program on Integrated Systems for the Humid Tropics (Humidtropics; http:// humidtropics.cgiar.org/), which takes an integrated systems approach to transform the lives of the rural poor, in the humid tropical parts of the world. Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, southwest China, is a small area of land (20,000 km 2 ) which historically had extremely high cultural and biological diversity, and is one of only two places in China which are considered to have a tropical climate. The region is renowned for producing high quality tea, but it is the rubber boom that has caused the greatest impacts on the landscape and economy of Xishuangbanna. Rubber has been planted since 1955, but during the late 1990s rubber prices boomed and small holder farmers rapidly planted increasing amounts of rubber. Now almost all natural forests of the lowlands (altitude 500-700m) and more than half of the mid-elevation land (700-900m) is planted with rubber. Land at higher elevations still supports mostly forest cover, tea and other farming systems, but rubber has encroached in recent years, despite expert doubts about the yield potential. The environmental impacts have been high, although not well quantified by academic literature. Habitat loss and biodiversity loss are obvious, and there are numerous reports of reduced water availability, increasing water pollution, soil hardening in some of the older plantations, and generally declining soil fertility (probably due to erosion and excessive agrochemical use). The economic impacts have also been great, with those farmers who manage successful rubber plantations making unprecedented profits for this region.In recent years (since 2012) the price of rubber has crashed to about 50% of its peak value. This has led many farmers to question whether or not they should continue with rubber as their main crop; although for now most farmers have chosen to wait and see if prices rise again. The other major popular cash crop is banana, which requires greater upfront investment, offers greater profits and causes even greater environmental impacts. The institutional context is in some ways very strong, but there are some crucial gaps which hamper progress. There are some excellent agricultural research facilities and groups operating in the region, and the government departments are well funded. There is also a well-functioning market system for major crops and companies can access most areas. The governmental style of leadership has moved on from ‘command and control’ towards individual decision making by every small holder. However, the communication between small holders and ‘experts’ is still unidirectional and sporadic. There is a vital disconnect between those with the knowledge and power to implement changes and those who manage the land through their small holdings. Generally, the living conditions and quality of life are better than average for rural people of the Mekong region. The average income for a rural person in Xishuangbanna is approximately $1,100 usd per year. However, there is great variation between the wealthiest areas ($3,000 per person per year) and the poorest areas ($600 per person per year). The people living at the high elevations tend to be poorer and less educated, and in some cases practice more mixed and traditional farming systems. The main challenges faced in Xishuangbanna at present are how to convince the large number of small holders to manage their rubber plantations for reduced environmental impact; how to cope with the rubber price crash; and how to aid the development of those peoples living in the higher elevations without further compromising ecosystem services.
Scenario Development as a Basis for Formulating a Research Program on Future Agriculture: A Methodological Approach
To increase the awareness of society to the challenges of global food security, we developed five contrasting global and European scenarios for 2050 and used these to identify important issues for future agricultural research. Using a scenario development method known as morphological analysis, scenarios were constructed that took economic, political, technical, and environmental factors into account. With the scenarios as a starting point future challenges were discussed and research issues and questions were identified in an interactive process with stakeholders and researchers. Based on the outcome of this process, six socioeconomic and biophysical overarching challenges for future agricultural were formulated and related research issues identified. The outcome was compared with research priorities generated in five other research programs. In comparison, our research questions focus more on societal values and the role of consumers in influencing agricultural production, as well as on policy formulation and resolving conflicting goals, areas that are presently under-represented in agricultural research. The partly new and more interdisciplinary research priorities identified in Future Agriculture compared to other programs analyzed are likely a result of the methodological approach used, combining scenarios and interaction between stakeholders and researchers