Common but differentiated responsibility for restoration and avoided degradation of commons: who pays for basic rights?

Commons, in the original meaning of land that is managed at community scale, have been privatized or taken over by the state as part of ‘development’ in many parts of the world in various stages of history. Part of the rationale for this was that communities weren’t strong enough institutionally to control the private interest of individuals, leading to overexploitation and resource degradation. Privatization was seen as a means to make overexploitation uneconomical and facilitate investment in land productivity and restoration. Elsewhere, the state took over claiming to be better stewards in securing national interests. “The real tragedy of the commons is that people believe collective action cannot effectively defend common interests”


Download :
English



Authors

van Noordwijk, M.,Catacutan, D.

Publication year

2017

Resilient Landscapes is powered by CIFOR-ICRAF. Our mission is to connect private and public actors in co-beneficial landscapes; provide evidence-based business cases for nature-based solutions and green economy investments; leverage and de-risk performance-driven investments with combined financial, social and environmental returns.

Learn more about Resilient Landscapes Luxembourg

2026 All rights reserved    Privacy notice